🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" policies represent an grave threat to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The true challenge confronting the EU is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Today, about 50% of the world’s top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening economic gap is driven by superior productivity growth in the US, fueled by technological innovation and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several major factors account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true capital markets union, a factor that caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population size, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was once met with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to advance substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: high-quality workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class labs. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.